<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: oDesk feedback: Take the good with the bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.savvylancer.com/odesk-feedback-take-good-with-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.savvylancer.com/odesk-feedback-take-good-with-bad/</link>
	<description>Tips and advice for freelancers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:50:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: exor</title>
		<link>http://www.savvylancer.com/odesk-feedback-take-good-with-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>exor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.savvylancer.com/?p=196#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, it seems there&#039;s still an element of manipulation and opportunity to invoke reciprocity.  If there is any possibility of future interaction with the provider, it&#039;s in your interest to give a 5-star rating.  You may tell the other party, &quot;I&#039;ve given you a 5-star rating - please be sure to review me&quot; - now, they can&#039;t verify that 5-star rating, but you&#039;ll note the opportunity for some rating manipulation is still there.  A better system would reward reviewers who do not always give 5 stars.  It&#039;s also in my interest to always award 5 stars because that means working with me, you&#039;re almost guranteed a 5-star feedback to up your score.  So you&#039;ll bid less because it&#039;s understood you&#039;ll get a 5-star feedback when we&#039;re done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, it seems there's still an element of manipulation and opportunity to invoke reciprocity.  If there is any possibility of future interaction with the provider, it's in your interest to give a 5-star rating.  You may tell the other party, "I've given you a 5-star rating &#8211; please be sure to review me" &#8211; now, they can't verify that 5-star rating, but you'll note the opportunity for some rating manipulation is still there.  A better system would reward reviewers who do not always give 5 stars.  It's also in my interest to always award 5 stars because that means working with me, you're almost guranteed a 5-star feedback to up your score.  So you'll bid less because it's understood you'll get a 5-star feedback when we're done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
